Redefining Power: When Leadership Becomes Control
I used to think leadership meant solving problems. You campaign, make promises, and then you show up for the people who put their trust in you to keep those promises. But that is not our reality right now. Instead, what we're witnessing is leadership redefined, not by service, but by spectacle. Not by solutions, but by schemes to consolidate power, silence critics, and rewrite the rules, to serve the few.
This isn't new. We've seen versions of this before. Richard Nixon's downfall came not just from criminal acts, but from his obsessive secrecy, his paranoia, and a pattern of self-preservation over public service. But where Nixon fell, this administration doubles down.
Instead of governing, it distracts. Instead of building trust, it builds confusion. The Signal chat leak-where top national security officials accidentally included a reporter in war planning, should've sparked outrage. Instead, it was buried beneath the next scandal and the one after that. While diversity programs were being dismantled and public attention steered toward phantom culture wars, deeper acts of erosion continued: gutting departments, silencing experts, and burying meaningful policy in a flood of headlines
And even in Trumps first term, when public servants did speak up-when they stood for the Constitution over loyalty-they were met with retaliation. James Comey, Sally Yates, Alexander Vindman, and others were removed not because they failed their duties, but because they didn't fall in line. And now with power returned to him, the same script is playing out-just more aggressively.
The most chilling moment may have come when Trump stood at the Department of Justice and declared himself “ the top law enforcement official” in the country. That wasn't just bravado-it was a direct challenge to the separation of powers, a foundational principle of democracy. In that moment, the message was clear: Institutions are only legitimate if they serve him. And now, with the DOJ reshaped and guardrails removed, he's using the full weight of government not to protect the people, but to punish his perceived enemies.
Journalists who expose uncomfortable truths become targets. Political opponents are branded as traitors. Even private citizens who speak out, face threats, lawsuits, or digital mobbing. What we're witnessing is not the careful application of justice. It's retribution masquerading as leadership. And that's why due process matters, even for those we're told to fear. The recent abduction of Venezuelan dissidents by ICE and their transfer to a foreign prison without clear legal proceedings should alarm us all. When leaders normalize bypassing international norms and domestic law in pursuit of enemies, it's not just about foreign actors, its a signal. A warning. Because once due process is optional for them, it's only a matter of time before it's optional for us.
This administration hasn't just wielded power recklessly-it's rewritten the rules to make that power harder to challenge. Through a series of executive orders, the president has sidestepped democratic processes and hollowed out government safeguards.
The trend continues from Trump's first term. Environmental regulations were rolled back, not to help the people, but to pad the profits of polluters. Orders banning travel from muslim majority nations were pushed through under the guise of national security, but carried the stench of discrimination and fearmongering. Money was funneled to border wall projects without congressional approval, undermining the power of the legislative branch and setting a dangerous precedent.
But the power grab doesn't stop at physical borders or executive overreach-it extends to the ballot box and the very structure of governance. Under the guise of “election integrity” this administration has supported overhauls that restrict access to voting, shift power away from nonpartisan election officials, and sow distrust in democratic outcomes. These aren't reforms; they're tools of control meant to exhaust the electorate, limit participation, and tilt the system to benefit those already in power.
Likewise, the restructuring of independent federal agencies is framed as efficiency, but the true goal is loyalty. By stripping protections, gutting oversight, and stacking leadership with loyalists, the administration isn't streamlining government-it's eliminating dissent. Agencies designed to serve the public are being repurposed to serve a single man's will.
This is not governance-it's a regime. A regime that punishes dissent, rewrites the rules, and cloaks authoritarian tactics in the language of patriotism. It doesn't serve the people; it strives to control them. It doesn't seek to unite; it thrives on division. When power is used not to protect freedom, but to concentrate it in the hands of the few, we are no longer witnessing a democracy in crisis, we are watching it unravel. And unless we name it for what it is, and stand together against it, history may not remember this as a turning point-but as the moment we let it all slip away.
And what happens next... depends on what we choose to do with it.
Silent Sentinel
“The watchman has spoken. Let the sleeper awaken.”
Clarity is the beginning of resistance.
[More articles]
(https://write.as/silent-sentinel)
Share this post:
If this message resonates, share it. The truth must not be silenced.